Is Cold Water Immersion Holding Back Your Cycling Gains Over Time
Abstract: This article explores the long-term effects of Cold Water Immersion (CWI) on cycling recovery during intense training periods. While CWI is beneficial for short-term recovery, its impact on performance gains over extended training periods remains debated. The review examines recent research to provide insights into how CWI affects cycling performance.
Keywords: Cold Water Immersion, Cycling Recovery Strategies, Ice Baths for Cyclist, Cycling Performance Enhancement
As a dedicated cyclist, you understand that recovery is just as important as training—especially during grueling training camps or high-volume training periods that can last up to six weeks. When pushing yourself to the limit, optimizing recovery becomes essential for sustaining performance throughout the season. One widely adopted recovery technique is Cold Water Immersion (CWI), often referred to as ice baths. This recovery strategy involves submerging the body in cold water—typically between 10-15°C—for a set period post-exercise. But how effective is CWI over the long term on cycling performance? Does it really improve recovery during prolonged training periods, or could it interfere with physiological adaptation?
Before understanding its long-term effects, it’s crucial to examine how CWI impacts recovery in the short term and how these immediate benefits might carry over during intense training. Let’s first examine CWI’s short-term recovery effects before diving into its potential long-term impact on cycling performance.
How Does Cold Water Immersion Affect Recovery?
CWI lowers local tissue temperature, which acutely (<92 hours) helps reduce swelling, pain, fatigue, muscle soreness, inflammation, metabolic activity, and the clearance of waste byproducts (7, 8). Studies show that consecutive days of CWI during race simulations better preserves sprint and time-trial ability compared to passive rest (7, 8) (for a review, please refer to blog article, ‘From Sprints to Time Trials: Boost Cycling Multi-Day Race Performance with Cold Water Immersion’). However, using CWI for recovery between multiple same day bouts of intense cycling, negatively affects maximum sprint ability compared to passive rest, with no effect on same day TT performances (4, 5) (for a review, please refer to blog article, ‘Does Cold Water Immersion Enhance Same-Day Recovery for Cyclists?’). While CWI is often praised for its short-term recovery benefits, the conversation shifts when we consider how it affects performance over extended training periods. The studies by Broatch et al. (2), Aguiar et al. (1), and Halson et al. (6) provide some valuable insights into what we know currently.
Cold Water Immersion Impact on Cycling Performance
Broatch and colleagues (2) examined how CWI impacted repeated sprint cycling training over a six-week period. The non-cycling participants engaged in high-intensity repeated sprint training, with one group using CWI (10°C for 15 minutes) and the other using passive recovery following training three times per week (2). Interestingly, the study found that both recovery interventions significantly improved 2km time trial (TT) performance, as well as watts at maximal oxygen uptake and peak power output during incremental testing, with no changes in 20km TT performance (2). The study found no significant differences between the effects of CWI and passive recovery on key performance metrics (2). Broatch and colleagues (2) also found that CWI had no additional impact on the molecular responses related to mitochondrial growth and oxidative metabolism compared to passive rest. Although it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from one study, future research should investigate the effects of CWI application on maximal sprint cycling performance.
Building on these findings, Aguiar and colleagues (1) conducted research to assess how CWI recovery influences endurance cycling performance in non-cyclists over four weeks of high-intensity interval training. The results showed that while both the CWI group (10°C for 15 minutes) and the control group improved their 15-km time trial performance, there was no significant difference between the two (1). Like the findings from Broatch and company (2), these results indicate that CWI did not have a noticeable effect on endurance cycling performance, even over a prolonged period of training. Unlike the findings by Broatch and colleagues (2), Aguiar and peers (1) noted that some markers of mitochondrial growth showed signs of potentiation. This would suggest that CWI might support long-term muscular adaptations without directly improving performance metrics. The finding on markers of mitochondrial growth requires further research to support the argument.
There is currently a limited amount of research that has investigated the long-term CWI recovery adaptations to cycling performance using trained cyclists. A study by Halson and peers (6) examined the effects of CWI on national level competitive cyclists on cycling performance. It was identified that using CWI as a recovery post cycling training over 5.5 weeks preserved greater cycling performance outcomes compared to passive rest (6) (for a review, please refer to blog article, ‘Cold Water Immersion During a Cycling Taper: A Performance Boost or a Performance Block?’). Given these differing results, it’s worth considering how the background of participants in these studies might have influenced the outcomes. Unlike, Halson et al. (6) who used elite cyclists, both Broatch et al. (2) and Aguiar et al. (1) used non-cyclists who were recreationally active. It is possible that the lack of cycling experience among the non-cyclist participants played a role in the findings presented.
Conclusion
Cold Water Immersion presents both advantages and limitations for cyclists during intense training during extended periods. While CWI can reduce soreness, inflammation, and fatigue in the short term (<92 hours), the evidence suggests that CWI does not enhance endurance cycling performance beyond the effects of passive rest over long-term (≤6week) training periods. Given the evidence, it’s challenging to recommend CWI use for training blocks focused on building long-term physiological adaptations, such as pre-season and specific pre-competition phases. CWI use may be suited to application during tapers and race days as the physiological adaptations have already been stimulated and developed during the previous training blocks. Ultimately, using CWI should be tailored to your specific goals and the demands of your training phases. As experienced coaches, we can help you develop a personalized recovery strategy that fits your unique needs.
Boost Your Cycling Performance with Expert Coaching
Ready to optimize your recovery and reach your full potential on the bike? Apply for a free consultation call and discover how personalized coaching can help you improve your recovery strategy and cycling performance. Don’t just ride—excel. Click here to apply now!
References
1. Aguiar PF, Magalhães SM, Fonseca IA, da Costa Santos VB, de Matos MA, Peixoto MF, Nakamura FY, Crandall C, Araújo HN, Silveira LR, Rocha-Vieira E, de Castro Magalhães F, and Amorim FT (2016) Post-exercise cold water immersion does not alter high intensity interval training-induced exercise performance and Hsp72 responses, but enhances mitochondrial markers. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 21(5):793-804.
2. Broatch JR, Petersen A, and Bishop DJ (2017) Cold-water immersion following sprint interval training does not alter endurance signaling pathways or training adaptations in human skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology, Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology, 313(4):R372-R384. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00434.2016. Epub 2017 Jul 5. PMID: 28679683.
3. Chan YY, Yim YM, Bercades D, Cheng TT, Ngo KL, and Lo KK (2016) Comparison of different cryotherapy recovery methods in elite junior cyclists. Asia-Pacific Journal of Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation and Technology, 25(5):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2016.06.001. PMID: 29264264; PMCID: PMC5730697.
4. Crowe MJ, O’Connor D, and Rudd D (2007) Cold water recovery reduces anaerobic performance. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 28: 994-998.
5. Egaña M, Allen L, Gleeson K, Gildea N, and Warmington S (2021) Post-exercise cold water immersion does not improve subsequent 4-km cycling time-trial compared with passive and active recovery in normothermia. Frontiers in Sports & Active Living, 25(3):738870. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.738870. PMID: 34761215; PMCID: PMC8573130.
6. Halson SL, Bartram J, West N, Stephens J, Argus CK, Driller M, Sargent C, Lastella M, Hopkins WG, and Martin DT (2014) Does hydrotherapy help or hinder adaptation to training in competitive cyclists? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46(8), 1631-1639.
7. Stanley J, Peake J, and Buchheit M (2013) Consecutive days of cold water immersion: effects on cycling performance and heart rate variability. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(2): 371-384.
8. Vaile J, Halson S, Gill N, and Dawson B (2008) Effect of hydrotherapy on recovery from fatigue. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 29: 539-544.
